According
to the WHO, it is the state’s legal obligation to ensure uniform access to
“timely, acceptable, and affordable health care of appropriate quality as well
as to provide for the underlying determinants of health, such as safe and
potable water, sanitation, food, housing, health-related information and
education, and gender equality” to all its people.
When
Article 21 guarantees Right to Life and Personal Liberty, it also covers Right
to Health within its ambit. Although it is not mentioned directly, Right to
Health has paved its way into fundamental rights through the Directive
Principles of State Policy. Article 39 (E) directs the State to secure health
of workers, Article 42 directs the State to just and humane conditions of work
and maternity relief, Article 47 casts a duty on the State to raise the
nutrition levels and standard of living of people and to improve public health.
It
was in the case of Bandhua Mukti Morcha v
Union of India & Ors that the Supreme Court
recognized the Right to Health to be included under the purview of Right to
Life as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution. Subsequently, in the case
of State of Punjab & Ors v Mohinder Singh Chawla, the apex court reaffirmed
that the right to health is fundamental to the right to life and should be put
on record that the government had a constitutional obligation to provide health
services.
In
a recent case of Chintan Jain v. CBI, it has been held by the
Gauhati High Court that receiving appropriate medical treatment is a right but
it cannot be made liberalised by choosing a private hospital of own choice when
the same treatment is very much available in the government hospitals. The case
revolved around an arrested person being under medication. When the jail doctor
suggested medical treatment in a hospital and the same treatment was very much
available in the Government Hospital, the Court denied allowing the petitioner
to be treated in a private hospital of his choice. In this case, the
fundamental right is not impaired; only the conversion of right into privilege
is restricted.