Diwan Advocates
SARFAESI and Secured Lending
Practice
A bank's borrower has not paid in over a
year. The account is an NPA. The security is a commercial property worth more
than the loan outstanding. Before SARFAESI, the bank filed a suit and waited.
Now it serves a demand notice, waits 60 days, takes possession, and sells at
auction. No court permission needed. If the borrower wants to fight it, the
borrower goes to the DRT.
A manufacturing company gets a possession
notice under Section 13(4). The promoters signed personal guarantees. They
believe the NPA classification was wrong and the demand notice misstated the
amount. They have 45 days to file before the DRT. After that, the right is
gone.
SARFAESI gives secured creditors real
power. It also gives borrowers and guarantors specific procedural rights that, used
correctly and quickly, can constrain that power. At Diwan Advocates, we work on
both sides: lenders enforcing, and borrowers and guarantors defending.
What SARFAESI Does
The SARFAESI Act, 2002 allows secured
creditors to enforce a security interest in movable or immovable assets without
going to court. It applies to scheduled banks, notified financial institutions,
housing finance companies, and NBFCs above the RBI's prescribed asset
threshold. Agricultural land, loans below Rs 1 lakh, and accounts where less
than 20 percent of the principal is outstanding are excluded.
The security interest must be a recognised
form under Indian law: equitable mortgage by deposit of title deeds, registered
mortgage, hypothecation over movables, or a charge under the Companies Act. An
unsecured guarantee alone is not sufficient.
The Enforcement Process: Step by Step
Step 1: NPA Classification
The account must be an NPA under the
applicable RBI norms before enforcement can begin. For banks, that means
interest or principal overdue for more than 90 days. A notice served before
proper NPA classification is vulnerable to challenge.
Step 2: Section 13(2) Demand Notice
The secured creditor serves written notice
on the borrower and guarantor specifying the amount due and the secured assets
intended to be enforced. The borrower has 60 days to pay in full. The
notice must be served by registered post. Defects in the notice or its service
are grounds for challenge before the DRT.
Step 3: Borrower's Representation
The borrower can make a written
representation within 60 days disputing the amount, the NPA classification, or
the notice itself. The secured creditor must consider it and, if rejected, give
written reasons. Failure to do so is a ground of challenge.
Step 4: Section 13(4) Possession
If payment is not made within 60 days, the
secured creditor can take possession, take over management, appoint a manager,
or require payment from a person who acquired the secured asset from the
borrower. Possession may be symbolic, by affixing a notice and publishing in
newspapers, or physical. Where the occupant resists, the secured creditor
applies to the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate under Section
14 for assistance. The CMM or DM acts in an executive, not judicial, capacity.
Cross-Law Note: Where
the secured asset is occupied by a tenant whose tenancy predates the mortgage,
that tenant cannot be evicted simply by virtue of the SARFAESI possession. The
Transfer of Property Act framework for mortgages determines whether the tenancy
is binding on the secured creditor. Lenders and auction buyers must both
account for pre-mortgage tenancies before acting.
Sale of the Secured Asset
Once in possession, the secured creditor
sells by public e-auction under the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules,
2002. The key requirements are straightforward: obtain a valuation, set a
reserve price at or above the valuation, publish a notice in two newspapers at
least 30 days before auction, and serve the notice on the borrower personally.
The borrower can redeem the asset at any
time before the actual sale by paying the full outstanding amount including
costs. This right cannot be contracted away. On completion of sale, the
authorised officer issues a sale certificate. The buyer's title is subject to
prior charges and statutory dues that rank ahead of the secured creditor.
Cross-Law Note: Buyers
at a SARFAESI auction should run a CERSAI search, an encumbrance certificate,
and a litigation check before bidding. The sale certificate does not extinguish
all prior encumbrances. TDS under Section 194-IA of the Income Tax Act applies
where the auction price exceeds Rs 50 lakh, and the buyer is responsible for
deducting and depositing it.
Challenging Enforcement: Section 17 Before the DRT
Any person aggrieved by a measure under
Section 13(4) can file an application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal within 45 days
of the measure. The DRT can condone delay for a further 45 days on sufficient
cause. Beyond 90 days, the right is extinguished. This is the hardest deadline
in SARFAESI practice.
Grounds of challenge include improper NPA
classification, defective or unserved demand notice, failure to consider the
borrower's representation, incorrect amount in the notice, exclusion of the
asset from SARFAESI's scope, and procedural failures in taking possession. A
stay of the sale pending the application is available but typically requires a
deposit of part of the outstanding amount.
Orders of the DRT can be appealed to the
Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal under Section 18. The DRAT requires a
pre-deposit of 50 percent of the debt as determined by the DRT, which can be
reduced on application. This deposit condition is the single biggest practical
constraint on appealing DRT orders.
Guarantors: Enforcement and Defences
Where a personal or corporate guarantor has
created security over their own assets, the Section 13(2) notice must be served
on them as well. They have the same 60-day period to pay and the same right of
representation. Their secured assets can be enforced in the same way as the
borrower's.
Guarantors have specific legal defences
under the Indian Contract Act, 1872: if the creditor
varied the principal contract without the guarantor's consent, released the
principal debtor, or gave time without reserving rights against the guarantor,
the guarantor may be discharged. Whether any defence is available depends on
the guarantee's terms and the facts.
Cross-Law Note: Personal
guarantors to corporate debtors can now face insolvency proceedings before the
NCLT under Part III of the IBC. A moratorium in the personal insolvency
proceeding can stay SARFAESI enforcement against the guarantor's personal
assets. Lenders and guarantors both need to account for this when the corporate
borrower is also in CIRP. Additionally, promoter-guarantors face potential
criminal liability under the BNS where the borrower company supplied false
information or fraudulently encumbered secured assets.
Asset Reconstruction Companies
ARCs acquire NPAs from banks at a discount,
step into the lender's shoes, and enforce the security under SARFAESI. They
fund acquisitions by issuing security receipts to qualified institutional
buyers. The RBI regulates ARCs under the Act.
When a loan is assigned to an ARC, the
borrower's counterparty changes. The ARC bought the loan at a discount and its
economics differ from the original bank's. This creates room for negotiated
settlement at amounts the original lender may not have accepted. We advise
borrowers on engaging with ARCs from a position of legal knowledge and
realistic commercial understanding of what the ARC needs to achieve.
SARFAESI and the IBC
When a CIRP is admitted against the
borrower, the Section 14 moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 stays
all SARFAESI enforcement, including proceedings already underway. An ongoing
auction can be halted. The secured creditor joins the Committee of Creditors
and votes on the resolution plan.
The strategic choice between invoking
SARFAESI and initiating CIRP depends on the security value, the business
viability, the number of creditors, and the prospect of a resolution plan.
Sometimes both routes run in parallel until one produces a result. We advise
lenders on this choice and manage both processes simultaneously where that is
the right approach.
Cross-Law Note: A
secured creditor who has taken physical possession of a secured asset before
the CIRP moratorium is not automatically required to hand it back to the
resolution professional. The position depends on the stage at which the
moratorium intervened and has been the subject of significant Supreme Court
decisions including Embassy Property Developments v. State of Karnataka (2019).
We advise on navigating this intersection in live matters.
Why Diwan Advocates for SARFAESI?
|
Both Sides
|
We
act for secured creditors enforcing and for borrowers defending. We know how
both sides think.
|
|
Speed
|
SARFAESI
runs on hard deadlines. A borrower who misses 45 days under Section 17 loses
a right that cannot be recovered. We move fast.
|
|
DRT and DRAT
|
We
appear regularly before Debt Recovery Tribunals across India and before the
DRAT on appeal.
|
|
IBC
Integration
|
When
CIRP begins alongside SARFAESI enforcement, the two regimes interact in ways
that change the strategy for both sides. We manage both.
|
|
ARC
Expertise
|
We
advise ARCs on portfolio acquisitions and enforcement, and borrowers on
negotiating with ARCs after assignment.
|
Legislative Reference Index
|
Legislation
|
Relevance
|
Reference
|
|
SARFAESI
Act, 2002
|
The
principal statute. Authorises secured creditors to enforce security interests
without court intervention, subject to prescribed procedure.
|
View ->
|
|
Recovery of
Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993
|
Establishes
DRTs and the DRAT. Borrowers challenge SARFAESI action under Section 17
before the DRT. Secured creditors file Original Applications for debt
recovery.
|
View ->
|
|
Insolvency
and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
|
The
Section 14 moratorium stays SARFAESI proceedings once CIRP is admitted.
Secured creditors participate in the CoC. The two regimes frequently operate
in parallel.
|
View ->
|
|
Transfer of
Property Act, 1882
|
Governs
the creation and enforcement of mortgages. SARFAESI enforcement operates
within the TPA framework for different mortgage types.
|
View ->
|
|
Indian
Contract Act, 1872
|
Guarantee
agreements are governed by the Contract Act. Guarantor defences including
variation, discharge, and giving time without reservation of rights arise
under this Act.
|
View ->
|
|
Companies
Act, 2013
|
Security
over company assets must be registered with the RoC within 30 days. An
unregistered charge is void against a liquidator or creditors on winding up.
|
View ->
|
|
Registration
Act, 1908
|
Mortgages
by deposit of title deeds and registered mortgages must comply with
registration requirements. Defects in registration can affect the validity of
the security.
|
View ->
|
|
Income Tax
Act, 1961
|
TDS
under Section 194-IA applies to auction purchasers where the property value
exceeds Rs 50 lakh. Income tax dues of the borrower can rank ahead of the
secured creditor in certain situations.
|
View ->
|
|
Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
|
Criminal
remedies are available where the borrower provided false information,
fraudulently encumbered the secured asset, or dissipated assets charged to
the lender.
|
View ->
|
|
Constitution
of India, Article 14
|
SARFAESI
enforcement actions by secured creditors, and the conduct of public sector
banks in particular, must comply with principles of natural justice. Courts
have intervened where the process was arbitrary or unfair.
|
View ->
|
SARFAESI runs on
deadlines that do not wait. Whether you are enforcing or defending, the time to
act is now.
Diwan Advocates is
ready.
Diwan Advocates |
Delhi, India