Diwan Advocates
Constitutional Law Practice
A state government issues a notification
under a land acquisition statute that takes private land for a private
development project. The affected landowners are told the acquisition is for a
public purpose but are given no hearing and offered compensation well below
market value.
A regulatory authority issues guidelines
that effectively prohibit a category of business activity without going through
the rule-making process under the parent statute. Companies affected by the
guidelines want to know whether they can be challenged and on what grounds.
Constitutional law governs the relationship
between the state and the individual and the distribution of power between the
Union and the states. At Diwan Advocates, we appear in constitutional matters
before the High Courts and the Supreme Court, advise on the constitutional
dimensions of regulatory action, and advise on federalism questions that arise
in commercial and regulatory contexts.
Fundamental Rights and Article 226
The Constitution of India guarantees
fundamental rights in Part III. Any law or executive action that infringes a
fundamental right is void to the extent of the infringement. The High Court's
writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and the Supreme Court's jurisdiction under
Article 32 are the primary mechanisms for enforcing these rights. Article 226
is wider than Article 32: it extends to any legal right, not just fundamental
rights, and can be used to challenge subordinate legislation, administrative
orders, and the conduct of statutory authorities.
Article 14: Equality and Arbitrariness
Article 14 guarantees equality before law
and equal protection of the laws. Courts have extended this guarantee to
prohibit arbitrary executive action: a decision that is capricious, without
rational basis, or taken without application of mind violates Article 14 even
if no specific discrimination is involved. This doctrine has been used to
challenge administrative orders, licensing decisions, and regulatory directions
that lacked reasoning or were made for extraneous purposes.
Article 19 and Article 21
Article 19 protects the rights to freedom
of speech and expression, peaceful assembly, association, movement, residence,
and the right to practise any profession or carry on any occupation, trade, or
business. Article 21 protects life and personal liberty. Both can only be
restricted by a procedure established by law, and courts have held that the
procedure must be fair, just, and reasonable. Restrictions on economic
activity, on the press, and on personal liberty are tested against these
standards.
Judicial Review of Delegated Legislation
Delegated legislation, including rules,
regulations, notifications, and guidelines issued by regulatory authorities, is
subject to judicial review. It can be challenged on the ground that it exceeds
the authority conferred by the parent statute, that it is arbitrary or
unreasonable, that it violates a fundamental right, or that the rule-making
process required by the statute was not followed. This is a significant avenue
for challenging regulatory action in commercial and industrial contexts.
Cross-Law Note: The
division of legislative powers between the Union and the states under the
Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India determines which level of government has authority to
legislate on particular subjects. Where state legislation conflicts with a
central law on a matter in the Concurrent List, the central law prevails. These
questions arise frequently in commercial regulation, environmental law, and
land acquisition, and can determine whether a law or regulatory action is valid
at all.
Why Diwan Advocates for Constitutional Law?
|
High Court
and Supreme Court
|
We
appear before the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court in writ petitions,
constitutional challenges, and PIL matters.
|
|
Regulatory
Challenges
|
We
advise companies and individuals on challenging regulatory actions that
exceed statutory authority or violate fundamental rights.
|
|
Federalism
|
We
advise on the division of legislative and executive competence between the
Union and states in regulatory and commercial contexts.
|
|
Advisory
|
We
advise governments, regulators, and regulated entities on the constitutional
validity of proposed legislation and regulatory action.
|
Legislative Reference Index
|
Legislation
|
Relevance
|
Reference
|
|
Constitution
of India
|
Articles
12 to 35 (Fundamental Rights), Article 226 (High Court writ jurisdiction),
Article 32 (Supreme Court), Seventh Schedule (legislative lists).
|
View ->
|
|
Specific
Relief Act, 1963
|
Injunctions
to restrain state action pending constitutional challenge are governed by the
Specific Relief Act principles applied in writ proceedings.
|
View ->
|
|
Land
Acquisition Act, 2013
|
Compulsory
acquisition of land for public purposes. Constitutional validity of
acquisition and adequacy of compensation are frequently litigated.
|
View ->
|
|
Right to
Information Act, 2005
|
Transparency
and accountability of state action. Used alongside constitutional challenges
to obtain information about administrative decisions.
|
View ->
|
|
Indian
Contract Act, 1872
|
Commercial
contracts that are invalidated by state regulatory action may give rise to
frustration or illegality defences under the Contract Act alongside the
constitutional challenge.
|
View ->
|
|
Competition
Act, 2002
|
Regulatory
action by the Competition Commission is subject to constitutional review in
appropriate cases, particularly where it affects the right to carry on
business under Article 19(1)(g).
|
View ->
|
Constitutional
challenges require careful preparation. Courts expect a clear legal framework
and a precise statement of the right that has been violated.
Diwan Advocates is
ready.
Diwan Advocates |
Delhi, India