Diwan Advocates
Competition Law Practice
A dominant player in a regional market
begins supplying below cost to squeeze out a new entrant. The new entrant has
documented the pricing but does not know whether it has a legal remedy or how
to pursue it.
Two companies in the same industry are
considering a merger. Their combined market share crosses the threshold that
requires Competition Commission of India approval. The timeline is tight and
the deal cannot close until approval is obtained.
Competition law in India governs how
companies behave in markets and how they combine with each other. The
Competition Commission of India has real enforcement powers, including fines of
up to ten percent of average turnover for three years. At Diwan Advocates, we
advise companies on compliance, represent parties in CCI investigations, and
advise on merger filings.
The Competition Act, 2002
The Competition Act, 2002 prohibits three
categories of conduct: anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position,
and combinations that appreciably adversely affect competition in India. The
CCI has the power to inquire, direct parties to cease and desist, impose
penalties, and order structural remedies including division of an enterprise.
Appeals lie to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and from there to
the Supreme Court.
Anti-Competitive Agreements
Agreements between competitors that fix
prices, limit production, allocate markets, or engage in bid rigging are
presumed to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition and are
prohibited without any need to prove actual harm. Vertical agreements between
parties at different levels of the supply chain are assessed on whether they
actually cause harm. Exclusive supply, exclusive distribution, and resale price
maintenance arrangements are evaluated on their effects in the relevant market.
Abuse of Dominant Position
A company is dominant in India if it is
able to operate independently of competitive forces in the relevant market.
Dominance itself is not prohibited but its abuse is. Abusive conduct includes
predatory pricing, limiting supply to the prejudice of consumers, using
dominance in one market to gain advantages in another, and imposing unfair or
discriminatory conditions in purchase or sale. Establishing dominance requires
a careful market definition exercise, which is often the contested issue in
these cases.
Merger Control
Companies proposing to merge, acquire, or
combine must file with the CCI if their combined assets or turnover exceed the
prescribed thresholds. The CCI has thirty working days to form a prima facie
view and may take up to two hundred and ten days in total. Most combinations
are cleared at the prima facie stage. Combinations that raise competition
concerns may be approved subject to modifications. We advise on whether a
filing is required, prepare the filing, and represent parties during the CCI
review.
Cross-Law Note: Sector-specific
regulators such as SEBI, TRAI, and IRDAI have their own competition-related
functions. Where a dominant company is also subject to sector regulation, the
question of which regulator has primacy over a particular conduct can itself be
a contested issue. The Competition Act, 2002 generally prevails over sector regulation in matters
of competition, but the interface between the two regimes requires careful
advice.
Why Diwan Advocates for Competition Law?
|
Investigations
|
We
represent companies and individuals under CCI investigation, from the
information stage through to the NCLAT and Supreme Court.
|
|
Merger
Filings
|
We
prepare and submit merger filings and manage the CCI review process,
including responding to requests for information and negotiating
modifications.
|
|
Compliance
|
We
advise companies on structuring agreements and commercial practices to avoid
competition law exposure before problems arise.
|
|
Market
Definition
|
The
outcome of most competition cases depends on how the relevant market is
defined. We invest in this analysis from the outset.
|
Legislative Reference Index
|
Legislation
|
Relevance
|
Reference
|
|
Competition
Act, 2002
|
The
principal statute. Anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance, merger
control, CCI powers, and NCLAT appeals.
|
View ->
|
|
Companies
Act, 2013
|
Merger
and amalgamation procedures run alongside CCI review. NCLT approval is
required in addition to CCI clearance for most combinations.
|
View ->
|
|
Consumer
Protection Act, 2019
|
Abusive
pricing and unfair trade practices may attract both CCI and consumer forum
jurisdiction. Coordination between the two is sometimes necessary.
|
View ->
|
|
Foreign
Exchange Management Act, 1999
|
Cross-border
acquisitions require both FEMA compliance and CCI approval where thresholds
are met. The two processes run in parallel.
|
View ->
|
|
Insolvency
and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
|
Acquisitions
through the IBC resolution process are exempt from certain CCI requirements.
The scope of this exemption has been the subject of litigation.
|
View ->
|
|
Specific
Relief Act, 1963
|
Where
a party seeks to restrain anti-competitive conduct pending investigation,
injunctions may be sought under the Specific Relief Act in addition to CCI
proceedings.
|
View ->
|
Competition
investigations move on the CCI's timeline, not the parties'. Early advice
changes the shape of the response.
Diwan Advocates is
ready.
Diwan Advocates |
Delhi, India