In
a recent case of Sholay Media Entertainment & Anr. vs. Yogesh Patel and
Ors., the Delhi High Court
imposed damages of Rs. 25 lacs for trademark infringement. This case was filed
against a domain name which used the word “Sholay” as sholay.com. creation of
such a website represented a clear deceptive similarity to the legendary movie
Sholay.
While
passing the judgment, Pratibha M. Singh, J., stated the following:
“Certain films cross the boundaries of just
being ordinary words and the title of the film ‘SHOLAY’ is one of them. Titles
and films are capable of being recognised under trademark law and in India
‘SHOLAY’ would be a classic example of such a case.”
This
case took an interesting turn when the defendants claimed that movies do not
fall under Goods and Services and are hence, not entitled to any protection
under the Trademarks Act. Negating this claim, the Court laid down that film
titles fall under the purview of trademarks and when it comes to a movie like
Sholay, it is way more significant because it is a brand in itself.
Irrespective of the class of persons using that website, everybody clearly
relates the word “Sholay” with the 1975 movie only.
There
are main three essentials of trademark 1) it should be marked; 2)it should be
capable of being represented graphically; and 3)it should be capable of
distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of others. Trademark give the product a
special identity of its own which makes it stand different from other similar
products along with that it also helps the consumer to identify it origin and
relate it to its quality so therefore trademark in a way guarantees the
unchanged quality of the product and help to build its brand image.
In
Compaq v Dell, ‘Dell’ computers published
an advertisement claiming that their home computers functioned similarly to
‘Compaq’ computers, but were cheaper. ‘Their claims about function were untrue
in various important details. The court found it to be an infringement and
granted interlocutory relief in respect of injurious falsehood.’
Hence,
it has been made clear by this case that movie names as famous and remarkable
as Sholay can also be treated as trademarks and they are required to be
protected against any infringement in any form as there is a great possibility
of a deceptive similarity and confusion occurring among people with regards to
the goods and services offered in the name of the movie.