It’s
been a long time since the lawyers of Western Odisha have been demanding for a
permanent High Court Bench in Western Odisha. For the past few years, these
requests have been coming up in the form of applications and agitations.
However, this time the agitation has been stretched too far where the lawyers
went on a strike and did not appear in the courts for legal proceedings to be
carried out.
While
condemning such abstinence from work and taking strict actions against them as
suspension of licenses, Say Kishan Kaul, J. stated,
“What is the core
issue? That every district wants a High Court instead of a district court? How
big is the state?" He added sarcastically, "Why not raise a demand for one
High Court outside each house?" "It is nothing but a display of ego
to demand that a High Court bench be constituted at your doorsteps. You can have
district judiciary at your doorsteps, but not a High Court. This cannot be
done. Odisha is not such a big state.”
The Industrial Disputes
act, 1947 has defined the term ‘strike’ under the section 2(q) as “a cessation
of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in combination or
a concerted refusal, or a refusal under a common understanding, of any number
of persons who are or have been so employed to continue to work or to accept
employment.”. however, strikes are generally done by employees or workers in
protest against the employer. On the other hand, legal profession carries a
certain code of professional ethics as it is a noble profession.
The
Supreme Court correctly stated in Krishnakant Tamrakar v. State of Madhya
Pradesh as follows:
“Every
strike does irreparable harm to the judicial system, notably to plaintiffs. The
right to strike is a fundamental right provided under the right to freedom of
association (Part III) of the constitution, which allows a group of individuals
who share a common interest to meet and assert their rights (Article 19 (c)).
However, freedom of association is not an absolute right under Article 19, and
it is subject to certain reasonable restrictions. As a result, whether lawyers have
the right to strike is one of the most often questioned questions in the legal
profession.
The
Supreme Court and the High Courts have said categorically that the lawyer's
strike is unlawful and those necessary measures must be taken to stem the
rising trend of outstanding cases in India in various judgments.”
Hence, in the present
scenario the Supreme Court is justified in making an order to call off the
strike. Such strikes and protests affect the noble nature of the profession in
many ways as it interferes in the smooth functioning of the judicial system by
increasing the pendency of cases and causing harassment to the plaintiffs and
the judges by not appearing before the courts