Although
we have known and recognised our National Emblem for years, an issue regarding
the National Emblem arose recently when one was unveiled on top of the new
Parliament Building in India. After the Prime Minister unveiled the National
Emblem, the concern that arose in the minds of all Indians in unification was
the representation portrayed through the emblem.
The
national emblem is an adaptation of the Lion Capital, originally found atop the
Ashoka Column at Sarnath, established in 250 BC. It was chosen as a symbol of
contemporary India’s reaffirmation of its ancient commitment to world peace and
goodwill. If we stress on the “world
peace and goodwill”, the recent issue seems a genuine case of concern. Section
6(2)(d) of the State Emblem of India (Prohibition of Improper Use) Act, 2005
provides for the display of the Emblem on public buildings. On the basis of
this provision, the National Emblem has been instilled on the top of the new
Parliament building.
The
idea behind the emblem was to represent peace which is why the original emblem
consisted of calm and composed lions whereas the emblem on the top of the new
Parliament building depicts angry and ferocious lions which do not stand in
consensus with the original purpose behind representation.
By
adopting this sculpture as the National Emblem, the Republic of India
recognizes its allegiance to the philosophies of Buddha, attested the positive
changes Ashoka brought to his kingdom and reaffirms its commitment towards
upholding peace and tolerance. With this being the basis of
concern, a petition has been filed by two lawyers at the Supreme Court claiming
that the ferocious-looking lions are defying the original objective of the
National Emblem. According to the petition, the Central Government has
“manifested gross arbitrariness in violating the sanctity of the state Emblem”. This misrepresentation of
personalities of the lions creates an interference in the philosophies
originally instilled in the emblem.